360 days

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , , on October 5, 2010 by exploringthehoax

This is an old post I apparently forgot about in drafts and never published. As it points to clues that all but SCREAM that this is a HOAX that all surfaced just before the 1 year anniversary, I am clicking “publish” on this today, 10/4/10.

Big week coming up and despite my better judgment I’m feeling some sense of anticipation with the 25th approaching.

To recap current events,




  • Katherine Jackson publishes a book about Michael through a website  http://www.jacksonsecretvault.com called Never Can Say Goodbye, and the site offers a35% discount coupon code “MJ LIVES”. Incidentally, 35% off of $59.99 results in a savings of $21 (777) Clue: Substantiated
  • LaToya interview the subject of an article in The News Of The World where she drops several clues, some more blatent then Jermaine’s now famous “airport… I mean hospital” slip up. Best head scratchers:

“He’s still here.” she insists. “He’s still with me and he’s just waiting to let the world know.”

“He’d love me to go out with him and see his fans. He loved to play cat and mouse with them.”

“There are lawyers, investigators, a lot of people working on this. It’s taking a long time but it’s still going on.” me in: the death investigation is concluded and has been presented to the DA. Murray has been long charged at this point. How old is this interview?

  • Coke Happiness Machine commercial does not fuzz out jacket bearing the clear insignia “Michael Jackson’s This Is It”. In comparison, all other corporate labels present on clothing of commercial extras is blurred. This is confirmation of a corporate sponsorship between Michael Jackson and Coke of some fashion. Remember, this isn’t AEG. Michael and only Michael owns the right to his image and name. Period. End of discussion. This commercial+obvious Coke product placement in Dr. Murray walk n’talk photo op on Venice Beach+Coke Killed MJ as Murray’s defense theory article on TMZ=Clue: Substantiated
  • Handwriting on a thank you note sent to the Sunflower guy who donated to MJs crypt allegedly from Lisa Marie Presley last month matches Michael Jackson’s writing. Clue: Substantiated
  • 70 days 70 days 70 days…….

    Posted in Uncategorized on September 8, 2010 by exploringthehoax

    Update on 70 days connections. Yes, I do realize no one is going to really understand this. My brain hurts from trying to track it but it seems very purposeful, by design if you know what I mean, and I think there’s even a pattern that explains the mysterious 64 period we are in right now.

    I found more 70 day spans. From the burial on 9/3/09 to the original end date of This Is It’s 2 week run 11/12/09 is 70 days. End phase one?

    74 day break (11/12/09–>1/25/09 is 74 days, odd 4 added here or a “do over” on the 70 cycle? Holiday break in the hoax as it came to be known).

    70 days before Murray’s first court date on 4/5/10 was 1/25/10, or the 7 month anniversary of the “death” on 6/25/09. I think the 74 days in Holiday Break was to sync the 70 cycle up with the 7 month anniversary of “death” and to use that day as the beginning of phase two. Additionally it may be possible that the day of the week is significant, with Thursdays being the 70 day cycle day in 2009, and Mondays being the 70 day cycle day in 2010 for some as of yet unknown reason. Better day of the week to fake court maybe?

    So this starts to link the time line:

    Begin Phase I:
    6/25/09 “death” day
    70 days
    9/3/09 “burial” day
    70 days
    11/12/09 end of TII 2 week run in theaters (showings ended up being extended)
    End of Phase I

    Then we have Holiday Break of 74 days.

    Begin Phase II:
    1/25/10 seven (7) month “death” anniversary (noted: 14 day period between 1/25 and 2/8/10, Murray arrest and arraignment)
    70 days
    4/5/10 Murray court date
    70 days
    6/14/10 Murray court date
    70 days
    8/23/10 Murray court date

    Now we are in the middle of an assumed* 64 day stretch until,

    10/26/10 scheduled meeting between lawyers and judge in Murray case
    70 days
    1/4/11 scheduled Murray court date

    *Worthwhile to note that the projected next date hasn’t occurred yet and we are used to dates being rescheduled and postponed so we will have to wait and see on what dates scheduled events actually occur.

    So if we keep an eye on this, We may yet have another 70 span if the 10/26 (Tues) date is delayed 7 days until 11/1/10 (Mon), the day AFTER Halloween, which is on a Sunday.

    OR, the next date could be delayed** 2 days to 10/28 (Thurs) mark a 66 day period which would account for the Holiday Hoax Break of 74 days, making these two periods equal to 140 days, or two 70 day spans. If that happens this will effectively end the 7th 70 day period in the hoax and it would fall on 10/28/2010, the 490th (7 7s or 7×7) day of the hoax.

    **or……. something completely different could happen on 10/28/10, the 490th day of the hoax. Something that has nothing to do with Murray or court.

    Or nothing at all might happen.

    So, you guys all get the 70 days thing, right? :? :| :geek:

    At least get this: there’s little chance these dates and this time line are coincidences.

    On a completely other side note……. The full beginning of Earth Song short was floating around the internet since April but it was revisited on the forum this week. I guess it was brought to the hoax community’s attention through a comment on a Believer’s group Facebook page laden with clues regarding a 10/29/10 planned video airing on CNN or some such, complete with allegations of being MJs secret girlfriend and baby momma.

    So whatever, it’s obvious BS but it brings this complete version of Earth Song just floating around free on the internet back to the discussion, which is good, because I think there’s a pattern here too.

    Consider this Earth Song thing; the version they showed us at the Grammys that was supposed to be the full! complete! yet before unseen! version was NOT full, complete, or unseen at all… in fact it was exactly the same thing we saw in TII… ok actually a shortened version of the shortened TII version……. and then the REAL full, complete, unseen version shows up randomly on YouTube or Facebook, as if it was delivered directly to the fans instead of being sold to them by Sony (TII) or the media (Grammys).

    This is just one example as well. The weird J5 Facebook page has interesting videos that really genuinely are unseen and available no where else. I can’t explain that away, it just is the case. It’s a little like Michael is handing us his REAL work directly, with no big corporate middle man who has an agenda. No agenda, just entertainment…. if we are just a little patient.

    With the Earth Song Grammys thing and TII too, he’s making them (Sony/media) look like idiots for over billing something and then not being able to deliver on the hype. “See the man you never knew”, huh? what in TII was the MJ we never knew? “Never before, unseen full version of Earth Song in 3D!!” Huh? That was a cut up version of TII Earth Song and the 3D was really poor. The audience leaves feeling let down or cheated.  This is in gross violation to Barnum’s philosophy of doing business, one which we know Michael emulated. Interesting to note that P.T. Barnum is remembered in part for the great lengths he went to expose how his competitors swindled their customers.

    I know I felt a little cheated after TII, especially with no Thriller short film. What they showed was like a trailer or teaser short. I know I felt a WHOLE LOT cheated after the Grammys with Earth Song because the marketing hype was so obvious that time, they CUT Earth Song, not showed the extended version! They lied and I was fuming for days over that.

    Come to think of it, this happened with TII too. Remember the full HD version of TII was available to be viewed online for free while it was still in theaters? Not on opening night but before the two week run was finished there it was, one click and you’re watching This Is It in HD, full screen, on your PC, no download necessary.

    You could also get the song This Is It online for free.

    It will be interesting to see if that happens with the “new” album Sony is throwing (up) out in November. Maybe just maybe he’s been trying to prove that in advance of this release too, like: don’t bother spending your money, it’s going to be available free online.  F*ck Sony, lol.

    While You Were Out…

    Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , , on August 22, 2010 by exploringthehoax

    All dates are approximate unless noted.

    August 1st: Michael Jackson is listed as director of the Conrad Murray Documentary on IMDB. Apparently this had been added at the end of June but no one noticed. The name was removed after a hoaxer submitted a notice of error to IMDB. By August 7th it was removed.

    August 2nd: A curtain was erected over Michael’s tomb at Forest Lawn. This was visible through the doors to Holly Terrace and the alert was posted on a non-believer’s Facebook account, and verified by multiple sources. Days later TMZ picked up on it and apparently asked FL what was up. FL provided a completely BS excuse (or at least TMZ chose to publish a completely BS statement) that the curtain was erected because some Yoga master’s disciples were coming to visit his grave and it was a heightened security feature to prevent a crazed MJ fan from sneaking in disguised as a yoga nut.  Problem with this is that the Yoga master’s tomb isn’t in the same wing as Michael’s and the one is not accessable to the other. So that’s complete bullshit. Curtain is removed a week or so later presumably, at last check no further reports that it is still there.

    August 7th (verified date): Marlon posts on the J5 twitter account, effectively knocking the “Army of Love” tweet, that TS used as his proof that he’s not a fake, off the page. Seems deliberate. No further activity on this account at the time of this post. This Just In: Upon recheck today 8/22/10, enough tweets were deleted from this page so that the “Army of LOVE” tweet is back at the bottom of the page. Now THAT’s super interesting.

    August 8th: The title of upcoming Elvis documentary is announced, “The Final Curtain”. 999 copies of the accompanying box set/book are said to be set for release by Sony.

    August 11th (verified date): TMZ article “Michael Jackson Resurrected by CSD”. CSD subsequently tweets: “New single with MJ, it’s a movie baby!”

    Week of August 16th: Small flurry of MJ related articles published by TMZ. “It’s All Good For Michael Jackson” about All Good Entertainment alleged contract with Frank DiLeo lawsuit officially dismissed in court. “Macaulay Culkin Surfaces… In Public” with accompanying pic of Mack with his brother in London wearing red shirt and black tie, weird considering this guy never gets photog’ed out n about. Seems everyone is in London these days. Also worth noting: “Brittany Murphy’s Mom Shared Bed With Monjack”, using identical rhetoric “shared bed” as the infamous Bashir interview on the same subject. VERY noteworthy is the last line of TMZ’s article: “the report doesn’t suggest sexual contact between the two”… after a headline like that– err… well Michael sure didn’t get the same consideration did he?

    August 19: Widely reported that Katherine and Joe Jackson are getting divorced… but not a peep from TMZ on the subject other then Harvey’s statement “calling BS on this” on TMZ live.

    August 21: Just in, TIAI redirect to blog entry from last year about a reporter camped outside Murray’s supposed Las Vegas home NEVER sees him. Also, Murray’s supposed home is across the street from the former home of Elvis’s doctor, Elias Ghanem. Here’s the blog page link:

    http://thestrippodcast.blogspot.com/2009/08/abcnews-baffling-mj-stakeout.html —-scroll down for the post.

    I find it odd that the reporter remarks that it’s “as if Murray had himself on house arrest”. Remember the YouTube statement? This blog is from around that time. Murray mentions he is afraid to leave his house, use the phone or answer email. Yet here he is living in a gated community where only this reporter and one distant poparottzi are outside (and, apparently neither ever got a pic of him). What’s Murray afraid of? Or was the YouTube statement an elaborate back story explanation for why we were never going to see this guy except under carefully staged appearances? The reporter seems to indicate this is odd behavior, to never address the media camped outside your house. Come to think of it, it is quite strange. We always get footage of the suspect arriving home, car swarmed with reporters, microphones, and flashbulbs; “did you do it? do you have anything to say in your defense? how do you intend to fight these charges?” etc. Or the peaceful 30 second long statement in which Murray could have said “the troot will prevail” to the press to appease them and make them go away. Why the very purposeful decision to put the statement on YouTube and not the network news?

    Wow, that’s tieing into some real retro Murray stuff right there.

    It’s kind of obvious that he’s not in that house. Or wasn’t at that time. Suggests fake address/staged site.

    The Elvis’s doctor lived across the street from Murray thing is EXACTLY like Elvis having lived across the street from Carolwood. That is NOT a coincidence and explains why this address was given as Dr. Murray’s home.

    to be continued.

    Hope all is well with you. I am perplexed by this lull in the hoax but no less confident in Michael’s living status. He’s out there somewhere but what he’s up to I no longer have any guess. Keep your chin up and go about your business, he has the right to shock and surprise us too.

    Hug your hoax friends, they’ve been through a lot with you.

    Court Monday. Will keep an eye out.

    Lisa Marie told us on day 001

    Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , on June 19, 2010 by exploringthehoax

    On June 26, 2009, Lisa Marie Presley blogs:

    Years ago Michael and I were having a deep conversation about life in general.

    I can’t recall the exact subject matter but he may have been questioning me about the circumstances of my Fathers Death.

    At some point he paused, he stared at me very intensely and he stated with an almost calm certainty, “I am afraid that I am going to end up like him, the way he did.”

    I promptly tried to deter him from the idea, at which point he just shrugged his shoulders and nodded almost matter of fact as if to let me know, he knew what he knew and that was kind of that.

    14 years later   I am sitting here watching on the news an ambulance leaves the driveway of his home, the big gates, the crowds outside the gates, the coverage, the crowds outside the hospital, the Cause of death and what may have led up to it and the memory of this conversation hit me, as did the unstoppable tears.

    She tried to deter him from the IDEA???

    On 6-26, I’m pretty sure everyone read this as “thought” as in “I promptly tried to deter him from the thought (of dying of a drug overdose)” without even blinking, instead of noticing the written word “IDEA”. Using the word IDEA here changes the entire meaning of what she expresses in this sentence. LMP essentially SAID: “I promptly tried to deter him from the idea (of faking his death like my Dad).”

    (Edited to Add: I just noticed LMP said “14 years later”… you mean to tell me it was conveniently and coincidentally 14, 7+7 years since this convo between MJ and LMP about MJ dying like Elvis took place? Not 13 or 15 but 14 years on the dot and she remembers this fact clearly. Tell me if you can remember exactly how many years ago you had deep personal convos with your loved ones and you can precisely and confidently state how many years ago it occurred because there’s not a chance on a bet that I could. I’m best off to say something like “a few years ago” or “several years ago”, or “maybe 5 or 6 years ago…?” But rarely can I rattle off exactly how many years it has been since x,y,z event and produce it so effortlessly. Now you might say “well, but LMP was blogging this so she had a chance to think back and record the number accurately before she posted.” Yes. Ok. True. But the fact remains that this profoundly prophetic convo took place ironically and coincidentally in a number of years ago divisible by 7… the number of the hoax. Not to mention she felt the number of 14 years important enough to include in this blog.)

    Holy Shiznut.

    And there’s more.

    He was an incredibly dynamic force and power that was not to be underestimated.

    No kidding LMP. This line makes even more sense after 11 months of investigating this hoax.

    Someone picked up on this line shortly after 6-25-09 but the following statement is also relevant to what we now have a greater appreciation for.

    When he used it for something good, It was the best and when he used it for something bad, It was really, REALLY bad.

    Mediocrity was not a concept that would even for a second enter Michael Jackson’s being or actions.

    This sentence is interesting, as well as the choice of words and the capitalization of The Scenario (LMPs doing in the original blog, see link following this entry)

    As I sit here overwhelmed with sadness, reflection and confusion at what was my biggest failure to date, watching on the news almost play by play The exact Scenario I saw happen on August 16th, 1977 happening again right now with Michael (A sight I never wanted to see again) just as he predicted, I am truly, truly gutted.

    Hint. The exact Scenario. TS.

    Ok, that’s seriously spooky and I just noticed it while typing this entry in. I have no idea what to make of it.

    Last item in the 6-26-09 LMP blog that is worth looking at with 11 month old eyes is the second to last line in the entry:

    The World is in shock but somehow he knew exactly how his fate would be played out some day more than anyone else knew, and he was right.

    Is it possible LMP is only “in the know” because of the conversation she had with Michael years ago (where she presumably discussed her father’s fake death), and was only slightly less surprised then we were on 6-25-09? I imagine her on the couch watching the helicopter transport the body going “why you crazy bastard, you went and did it after all.”

    Lisa Marie’s original blog post is here:


    Interesting stuff.

    Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, the Earth is Flat, and Other Widely Accepted Innaccuracies

    Posted in Uncategorized with tags , on June 4, 2010 by exploringthehoax

    Just think about all the things you once believed that you now understand to be false….

    Recently Badkolo’s infamous theory commonly know as the “2005 Trials Were a Hoax” theory has resurfaced thanks to my posts regarding the Pepsi accident possibly having been hoaxed by Michael Jackson. It has come to my attention that there is a great deal of misinformation out there in the hoax community about this theory so I elected to officially document it to clear up the rumors and correct the misconceptions that run rampant in some circles.

    The theory does not state that the 2005 trial itself was a hoax, in fact it depends on the fact that the proceedings were very real. More accurately the theory states that Michael in a sense baited the DA (and the Arvizo family) in an attempt to prove a point. An attempt that ultimately failed in it’s purpose and message.

    Do you really think Michael got fooled by Bashir? Do you really think he is that stupid? I don’t understand how someone can think Michael is brilliant enough to orchestrate a death hoax of this magnitude yet dumb enough to get fucked over that badly. Come on. Of course he knew Bashir would smear him, that’s why he had his own cameras filming everything in the back round. Do you really think after one set of child molestation allegations Michael would continue to host sleepovers with minors WITHOUT CCTV in the bedroom? And then do a very personal revealing train wreck of an interview designed for a national audience where he gave up all control over the aired edit?

    Don’t you agree that it’s possible Michael called the DA’s bluff by taunting him with this interview KNOWING they had nothing on him, and that’s why he did that Bashir piece with the kid and the insistence that sharing your bed is a loving thing to do? Because he could prove beyond a shadow of a doubt nothing inappropriate happened- perhaps he was defiantly trying to set it all up to prove once and for all his innocence on the public stage. You want to call me a kid toucher mother fuckers? I’m gonna prove you’re all sick liars.

    Do you really think Michael was naive enough to trust that family of track record con artists the Arvizos or do you think it’s possible he set them up/used them if you will?

    Perhaps, just maybe, he intended to take it to trial to PROVE that the DA is shady and the cops are corrupt and the family were gold diggers and that the media unfairly condemn people with no evidence of wrong doing but the plan backfired and the message never got properly relayed.

    People weren’t listening, the media reported their version of the facts, and the “hoax” was a PR fail. You win some you lose some. With CCTV in the bedroom, there’s no way he’d ever set one foot in prison. It would be the wild card of defense evidence and ended up being unnecessary to present. Why wouldn’t Michael’s defense team present CCTV tapes if they existed? Because then there would have been no trial, no public display, no hoax.

    Do you REALLY think Michael Jackson would do a DEATH hoax the first time out? Or do you think it’s plausible that he has hoaxed before, possibly many times?

    Badkolo adds this:

    The same way its so easy for so many of us to accept that he hoaxed his death is the same way it should be easy to comprehend that it takes time and a agenda to pull off something as complicated as a death hoax. Whatever sparked the initial idea of a death hoax is what we are all searching for. If we are to believe that he wasn’t as naive and fragile as some make him out to be then we can agree that Michael Jackson was a genius. If we are going to be open minded enough to allow the thought that he left clues in many of his songs, left them in his memorial, and that almost everything surrounding this so called death hoax is full of clues, then it shouldn’t be a issue to be open minded about the possibility that Michael Jackson has staged and hoaxed numerous other events in his life.

    Perception is key. If we can agree that Michael is hoaxing his death, then we can also agree that hes the one pulling the strings behind the scenes, and if that is the case, then everything that has been revealed to us over time is exactly what Michael wanted us to see. Take into account everything that has been revealed and then decide how much of what has been seen throughout the years is real or a matter of perception. Do you really know what you have been seeing, do you?

    …and You’re Gonna Get Burned

    Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , on June 1, 2010 by exploringthehoax

    I’m going to stick my neck out and say the 1984 Pepsi burn accident was an elaborate media hoax.

    Despite the controversial nature of this subject I have to admit it’s most likely true, and it I am gathering the evidence to prove it.

    I’ve put it up for debate on both mjdhi.com and mjhd.net and I haven’t seen any solid, reasonable argument that it’s not possible for Michael Jackson to have hoaxed the Pepsi accident. On the contrary,  the more I read exactly what few arguments exist against the theory, the more I start to realise it’s probably true.

    I think we have to be REAL careful in what we THINK we know about Michael Jackson. We really only know what he wants us to see. How much of that is carefully designed and orchestrated? Discover the man you never knew? Thoughts I presented for debate to both forums that to date have gone unchallenged:

    :idea: Maybe he punked Pepsi along with everyone else.

    :idea: Maybe everyone in the crowd and crew thought it was real. Michael was already an accomplished actor by this time in his career.

    :arrow: We don’t really know for a fact that the pyro was what caught his hair on fire. We only know from the footage that they went off and then his hair had smoke coming from it.

    :idea: Dave Dave could have been a clue pointing to this too. Michael disguised as a burn victim. Also the Pepsi footage media flood in mid July points toward this event being extremely significant.

    :!: The accident, in part, lead to the greatest endorsement deal ever, a Guiness record, Michael and his name benefited heavily from media coverage and sensationalism. It also paved the way for the resulting alleged Demerol addiction. Would pretending to be a drug addict benefit Michael Jackson? I have no idea but I suppose possibly. Depends on the agenda at the time maybe.

    :idea: This incident also took place during Michael’s media hoax era between Thriller and Bad albums.

    :!: Maybe he considers the Pepsi incident his greatest media hoax ever, and this death hoax is the sequel… It would explain why the brothers are so prominent now and all of a sudden. Also the ushers uniforms at the burial being from the Victory tour now suddenly make perfect sense.

    :!: Maybe he donated the money and equipment to the childrens hospital to make the hoax all for L.O.V.E.

    You can read the threads here on Souza and Mo’s forum:


    and here if you are a member of .net (boo, stupid policy):


    A few others have come out in support of the theory on the forums. In particular, MJDHI forum member friendlikeme81 offered the following supportive facts and information to some of the debate points I presented.

    Here’s a pic friendlikeme81 provided to illustrate the difference in Michael’s hair in the burn accident video and in the days just before and JUST AFTER.

    Notice the size of his head in the middle pic and the density of the afro he suddenly had immediately after the fire is put out. The pic on the far right is Michael at the Grammy Awards just 4 weeks after the burn allegedly was suffered.

    From above:

    :!: The accident… also paved the way for the resulting alleged Demerol addiction. Would pretending to be a drug addict benefit Michael Jackson? I have no idea but I suppose possibly. Depends on the agenda at the time maybe.

    friendlikeme81 goes on to point out the following regarding alleged medical treatment Michael Jackson received following the accident:

    3. no medical treatment after the accident:
    Although he had third degree scalp burns, he was released from the Brotman Memorial Hospital one day later, on January 28th, and even visited other burn victims before leaving (source: A. Grant. A visual documentary)
    If he was indeed injured with 3rd degree burns, he would never have been released that early, because the risk of infection would have been too high. The necessary medical treatment cannot be done over night! Michaels first appearance in public was his visit to the Los Angeles zoo in company of Emmauel Lewis on February 5th. If Michael was really injured, he would have risked his life by doing that!

    From above:

    :arrow: We don’t really know for a fact that the pyro was what caught his hair on fire.

    Pic provided by "friendlikeme81"

    friendlikeme81 continues, pointing out that in the video of the accident footage, we never see the exact screen in which Michael’s hair is ignited, instead at that moment the screen goes white, then it flashes back to his head smoldering and he decends the stairs.

    From above:

    :idea: Dave Dave could have been a clue pointing to this too. Michael disguised as a burn victim. Also the Pepsi footage media flood in mid July points toward this event being extremely significant.

    Pic provided by "friendlikeme81"

    friendlikeme81 offers this explanation which gave me the chills and I know makes perfect sense now:

    Miko was the first one on stage who reached Michael as Michael claims in his Moonwalk biography. Dave Dave is the character that is linked to Michael because both are burn victims. We know that Dave Dave is Michael at LKL, it is his disguise, a sort of second identity. He shows up with Miko Brando. It can be a coincidence because they are close friends, but it can also have a symbolic meaning: Michael’s burn victim hoax in 1984 + Miko and Michael’s burn victim hoax in 2009 + Miko.

    I think we’ve been punked before and we are getting punked again. Pretty shocking really and yet I’m incredibly entertained.

    Playing With Fire

    Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , on May 31, 2010 by exploringthehoax

    The 9282 days thing in regards to the Pepsi burn accident being the exact midpoint of Michael Jackson’s life has been nagging at my brain like a spiteful woman. It goes round n round like this little persistent voice in my head that won’t go away no matter how much I ignore it.

    So to review 9282 days, some clever hoaxer out there did the math and discovered that the date of the Pepsi burn accident is exactly 1/2 way between Michael’s birth and “death” date. Which of course suggests that the death date was designed purposely to encompass this event as quite significant to Michael and likely the hoax as a whole. So moving forward, we are bombarded with Coke product placement and tie-ins, Sunflowers and happiness machines and AEG endorsements etc. Enough to make your head spin a little. Does our hoax have a sponsor?

    Fine. This is a little nuts but totally mainstream still. So Michael designed the death date to draw attention to the horrible disfiguring accident caused by carelessness of Pepsi shoot pyrotechnitions which saddled him with addiction for the rest of his life. Ok. I know you’re all still with me at this point.

    Are you ready? Here’s where I’m gonna venture off the beaten path with a little help from my very best hoax friend and suggest something just a wee bit off the wall. Do the numerology addition on the number of days and you come up with:

    9+2+8+2=21… 21 (7.7.7)

    which is quite nuts as it suggests that the Pepsi accident would have to be by design…. unless you believe in divine intervention with adherence to numerology… which I don’t. I believe numerology and 777 is important to Michael.

    K let’s jump in.

    Did you watch? The whole thing? Crazy right? Ok, well, their hair is on fire just for a second, neat stunt but just a stunt. Keep watching, it gets crazier.

    How about that? Pretty nuts right? Yeah, ok, dude’s got a big afro which protects his head and all, but Michael has a ton of gerry curl in his hair which is flammable and accelerated the fire. K… keep watchin.

    You asked for it. No afro, tons of accelerant, long burn time, no injury.

    You have to face it, it’s very possible Michael hoaxed that accident.

    The Living Crucifixion

    Posted in Uncategorized on May 6, 2010 by exploringthehoax

    I’m remembering what drove me to obsessively research this hoax in the first place and it’s bothering me today.

    WE crucified Michael Jackson. We treated him horribly. We falsely accused him. We let him down.

    We used to love him. We used to listen to his music and call his name and shout and cry and clamber for any glimpse of him, buy any product he endorsed, emulate his every move and way of dress, he was a God. We championed him, we revered him, we hoisted him up upon a towering pedestal, and then we destroyed him.

    We drug him down, into the filth and the mud. We painted him with the most heinous and hideous of all crimes on a prosecutors whim and when 12 jurors acquitted him we still did it anyway. We forced him to wear the scarlet letter of shame and disgrace as an innocent man and we did it gleefully… and we did it not because he earned it, we did it simply because he’s different. We crucified Michael Jackson because he’s weird.

    You might say, “who’s we? Not me.” But the WE I speak of is us, the news consumer, the voting demographic, the vocal majority, the general public. WE who read the news and watch the TV. WE who believe the headlines at face value. WE who have no dissent and stand idly by. The living crucifixion of Michael Jackson played out in real time before our eyes, over a matter of years while we bought the papers and watched the interviews and listened to the commentaries and performed passive silence. We so easily forgot who he was in favor of the image that was being portrayed to us.

    I sometimes wonder if humanity really even deserves Michael Jackson. After giving so much of himself to mankind only to have mankind slowly, progressively, and completely destroy him, Michael Jackson would truly have to be the second coming of Christ to want to come back to save it. Wouldn’t we just let him burn all over again?

    And at the same time I so badly need him to come back and prove them all wrong. In one fell swoop he could prove the media distorts and the DA is corrupt and everything we have thought to be true a lie… by making the ultimate comeback.

    Shifty Eyed Klein rides again

    Posted in Uncategorized on May 5, 2010 by exploringthehoax

    So Klein calls up TMZ live to proclaim that Michael Jackson was gay and Klein’s employee (son???) was the love of his life. Ok Klein, now you’ve got everyone’s attention. Fan or non-fan, who didn’t get wind of this one? It’s tailor made for gossip.

    I found this article which spawned this post,


    Well seems Klein has a small problem. He has violated HIPAA laws…. not once, not twice, not even recently, but many times over the course of the past 10 months. Seems every single time he has gone media whoring, Klein has violated this law.

    Klein began by revealing personal details about his friendship with the singer. To my surprise, he then divulged facts about Jackson that only a physician knows about a patient. In describing his first meeting with Jackson, Klein noted how the singer had “a butterfly rash and he also had severe crusting you could see on the anterior portion of his scalp.” He subsequently “did a biopsy” on Jackson and diagnosed him with Lupus, an autoimmune disorder that causes those and other symptoms.

    Klein went on to reveal many other details, like how he was “rebuilding” Jackson’s face before his comeback concert. On the subject of drug use, Klein continued to chat up the audience. He admitted to providing Jackson with Demerol to sedate him and stated that, contrary to reports, Jackson was not “riddled with needle marks” (though Klein told King he never examined his entire body). Perhaps most revealingly, Klein, as if he had Jackson’s chart in front of him, dished about the singer’s past medical history. “Michael, at one time, had an addiction,” he said. “And he went to England and he withdrew that addiction at a secure setting, where he went off of drugs altogether. And what I told Michael when I met him in this present situation when I was seeing him, that I had to keep reducing the dosage of what he was on, because he came to me with a huge tolerance level.”

    This is a problem for Klein because he has revealed intimate medical details on one of his patients.  The HIPAA law expressly prohibits this, explained here:

    Basically, the law forbids medical professionals from disclosing health information unless a patient provides consent to do so. Among other things, HIPAA is the reason that your doctor can’t fax a letter to you or transfer your records to another doctor without your filling out permission forms. It’s the reason the mother of a teenage patient of mine, a nurse, was disciplined when she looked at the medical records of her own son. It’s also the reason you’ll never see me, or any other physician, reveal the identities of our patients — without their consent — when we discuss or write about them.

    Klein could face sanctions, fines, and disciplinary proceedings as a medical professional for violating this law. And Klein is of course aware of this law and the line he has crossed as exposed here in this statement released by his lawyers shortly following 6-25-09:

    “Dr. Klein is aware of media reports connecting him to Michael Jackson. Because of patient confidentiality, Dr. Klein will make no statement on any reports or allegations. Out of respect for his patients and adherence to federal HIPAA regulations, Dr. Klein asks that the media not contact him or his patients, nor interfere with their medical treatments. Like millions of Michael’s fans around the world, Dr. Klein is saddened by Michael’s death and extends his condolences to the family.”

    Following this statement, Klein set off on the talk show circuit.

    What makes this situation truly odd is this. Klein touts himself “dermatologist to the stars”. By “betraying” Michael, Klein has committed virtual career suicide. Tell me what celebrity wants to continue to be a patient of shifty eyed, loose lips Klein, now that he is acting as the tabloid source for all things juicy following the “death” of one of his high profile clients? Call me crazy but I don’t see a lot of Hollywood’s A list signing up to be the next source for fodder.

    If this was for real, Klein’s office would be instantly transformed into a ghost town with nothing on the book. Suddenly this man should be experiencing a whole lot of free time for his willful sharing of personal information. Why in the world would Klein DO this?

    Really the whole thing makes no sense UNLESS Klein is covered under one of the follwoing two loopholes in this law.

    1. Klein is telling LIES, which does not violate the HIPAA law because the information is not accurate, or
    2. Michael gave Klein consent to speak publically about his medical conditions

    The author of the referenced article closed with this statement:

    At the same time, said Phillips, it’s possible that Jackson may have given Klein permission to discuss his PHI, or private health information, in public. In that case, Phillips [Stephen K. Phillips, a healthcare attorney in San Francisco] said, “you haven’t violated the law by doing so, unless and until that authorization is withdrawn.” I tried to contact Klein to clarify these important points several times, but never received a response. His attorney didn’t get back to me either.

    So Klein could be straight up lying… and free and clear under the law… but playing a very dangerous game with his career, or Michael is directing him to talk. Bottom line,  when you look at the law, and the facts, Klein is good for the hoax.

    I Know Why The Kids Were Revealed Weeks Before 6-25-09

    Posted in Uncategorized on May 3, 2010 by exploringthehoax

    To protect them…

    This entry was originally posted on MJKit 8-11-09, reposted on 11-29-09 to http://michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=410

    I think it is an important bit of information that refocuses me back to common sense, logic, and legality…. all things we MUST remain anchored to in order to not get distracted by fluff and the obscure. The further we stray from Real Life, the more we risk letting the TRUTH slip between our fingers.

    Common sense and logic, it will lead us in the right direction.

    Under California law, DNA is irrelevant when it comes to questioning parentage IF the child was born into a marraige AND the parents names are entered on the birth certificate AND the parentage is not challenged for 3 years after birth.

    So, many rumors are flying that Prince and Paris are not bio-kids to MJ, right? Blanket on the other hand, most believe is MJs bio-kid.

    Here, i’ll break it down slowly.

    Rumors are flying following MJs “death”. These rumors would be easily foreseen following the death of MJ, as he is MJ, and his life was shrouded in one big rumor and ugly press, it only stands to reason that the gossip would intensify following his passing. The kids and their parentage are an obvious topic of debate, considering their complexion and the secrecy surrounding them. It’s a no-brainer that they would be the subject of speculation and rumor, right? The very reason MJ protected them their whole lives by concealing their identities.

    So, a couple weeks before 6/25, Paris and Prince are seen in public for the very first time unmasked.


    Well, if you follow logic and common sense and look at state law, the reason is obvious.

    Because Paris and Prince were unmasked shortly before 6/25 we KNOW they are the MJ kids, under the definition of California law. They were born to Debbie Rowe while she was married to MJ, his name is on the BC, and they are obviously living with MJ as his children, thanks to the pic we have from early June, no one would (or has) contested these facts.

    If anyone comes forward now and claims parentage by DNA, and it MATCHES…. well too bad, under CA law, the time for contesting parentage has run out years ago and it cannot be challenged in court. It is too late by 8 years or so. They were born to a married couple, MJ is on the BC, and the kids have lived with MJ as their father from birth. CA law prevents anyone, even a bio-parent, not listed on the BC, from coming forward and gaining custody.

    There is one loophole in Michael’s situation. The very thing he used to protect his children could leave them vulnerable in his… absence: the masks.

    IF we had not seen these kids unmasked in early June, one or both of their bio fathers could come forward making some crazy claim that the kid(s) never lived with MJ at all and try to take them away. A true bio parent could successfully claim that MJ never acted as parent all these years since we never really saw these children unmasked in the past 8 years. Old family photos are little proof of identification of adolescents when you have a different DNA match and you’re standing in front of a court of law.

    In other words, if MJ wasn’t seen with them recently, it could be argued in court that Paris and Prince are not the same little kids seen in old home movies or family photos, and with a DNA match, someone could make a legal argument for taking them away, totally within CA law.

    Those unmasked pics from early June make such a claim imposible under the stipulation of California state law, regardless of DNA.

    Got all that? Hopefully. Because it shows extreme forethought and the great painS Michael went through to ensure all this was done within legal guidelines ahead of time. All the i’s were dotted, all the t’s crossed, perfection, right down to the legal framework of the plan.

    Brilliant, and logical. Common sense, it will lead us to the truth.