I Know Why The Kids Were Revealed Weeks Before 6-25-09

To protect them…

This entry was originally posted on MJKit 8-11-09, reposted on 11-29-09 to http://michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=410

I think it is an important bit of information that refocuses me back to common sense, logic, and legality…. all things we MUST remain anchored to in order to not get distracted by fluff and the obscure. The further we stray from Real Life, the more we risk letting the TRUTH slip between our fingers.

Common sense and logic, it will lead us in the right direction.

Under California law, DNA is irrelevant when it comes to questioning parentage IF the child was born into a marraige AND the parents names are entered on the birth certificate AND the parentage is not challenged for 3 years after birth.

So, many rumors are flying that Prince and Paris are not bio-kids to MJ, right? Blanket on the other hand, most believe is MJs bio-kid.

Here, i’ll break it down slowly.

Rumors are flying following MJs “death”. These rumors would be easily foreseen following the death of MJ, as he is MJ, and his life was shrouded in one big rumor and ugly press, it only stands to reason that the gossip would intensify following his passing. The kids and their parentage are an obvious topic of debate, considering their complexion and the secrecy surrounding them. It’s a no-brainer that they would be the subject of speculation and rumor, right? The very reason MJ protected them their whole lives by concealing their identities.

So, a couple weeks before 6/25, Paris and Prince are seen in public for the very first time unmasked.


Well, if you follow logic and common sense and look at state law, the reason is obvious.

Because Paris and Prince were unmasked shortly before 6/25 we KNOW they are the MJ kids, under the definition of California law. They were born to Debbie Rowe while she was married to MJ, his name is on the BC, and they are obviously living with MJ as his children, thanks to the pic we have from early June, no one would (or has) contested these facts.

If anyone comes forward now and claims parentage by DNA, and it MATCHES…. well too bad, under CA law, the time for contesting parentage has run out years ago and it cannot be challenged in court. It is too late by 8 years or so. They were born to a married couple, MJ is on the BC, and the kids have lived with MJ as their father from birth. CA law prevents anyone, even a bio-parent, not listed on the BC, from coming forward and gaining custody.

There is one loophole in Michael’s situation. The very thing he used to protect his children could leave them vulnerable in his… absence: the masks.

IF we had not seen these kids unmasked in early June, one or both of their bio fathers could come forward making some crazy claim that the kid(s) never lived with MJ at all and try to take them away. A true bio parent could successfully claim that MJ never acted as parent all these years since we never really saw these children unmasked in the past 8 years. Old family photos are little proof of identification of adolescents when you have a different DNA match and you’re standing in front of a court of law.

In other words, if MJ wasn’t seen with them recently, it could be argued in court that Paris and Prince are not the same little kids seen in old home movies or family photos, and with a DNA match, someone could make a legal argument for taking them away, totally within CA law.

Those unmasked pics from early June make such a claim imposible under the stipulation of California state law, regardless of DNA.

Got all that? Hopefully. Because it shows extreme forethought and the great painS Michael went through to ensure all this was done within legal guidelines ahead of time. All the i’s were dotted, all the t’s crossed, perfection, right down to the legal framework of the plan.

Brilliant, and logical. Common sense, it will lead us to the truth.


3 Responses to “I Know Why The Kids Were Revealed Weeks Before 6-25-09”

  1. I’ve been reading ur blog 4 a while now, & with all the craziness that’s flying out there reading a statement like this made me feel at home: “all things we MUST remain anchored to in order to not get distracted by fluff and the obscure. The further we stray from Real Life, the more we risk letting the TRUTH slip between our fingers.”

    I wish more people would think they same way. I know that this case requires us to use our imaginations & speculate, but also we have to use common sense & logic, as you very well stated.

    I like how u go based on facts & stay away from a lot of crazy mind control stuff that’s floating out there. a tip of hat 2 u my friend.

  2. Breakodawn Says:

    I have just re-read your post,and it is brillantly explained.I always wondered why we saw that photo of the children un-masked.Michael had certainly covered all his bases.He is one smart man.As we know a genius.That probably explains why no-one bothered to push for DNA tests on the children.You are one smart man Michael.Lets hope the truth will prevail.Please keep up your great researching.We have a very busy and emotional month coming.Always with L.O.V.E.

  3. Daphne Says:

    Well, the kids faces actually appeared on the news in 2007 and 2008. You can google it. They were in Vegas then.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: